Fakira @ Phakira @ Imamuddin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60428 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2019 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== FAKIRA @ PHAKIRA @ IMAMUDDIN Son of Nizamuddin Resident of Village- Near Adda No. 2, Chik Toli, Siwan, Police Station- Siwan Town, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2019 in connection with Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva O.P.) Case No. 101 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457/380 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents and that nothing was recovered from his physical possession, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Siwan Muffasil (Mahadeva O.P.) Case No. 101 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60428 of 2019(2) dt.24-10-2019 2/2
(1) One of the bailors will be the father of the petitioner.
(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.
(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T