Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68557/2025bail granted

Sahil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-23Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68557 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2025 Thana- PATNA CITY CHOWK District- Patna ====================================================== Sahil Kumar son of Chunchun Kumar @ Chunchun Chandrawanshi Resident Of Village -Karai, Ps -Nauwatpur, Dist -Patna P/A-Resident of village- Lodi Katra, Naharpur, near Tel Deepu, P.S- Khajekalan, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akshay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 258 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 334(1) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that some unknown miscreants have committed theft in the mobile shop of the informant at night.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68557 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused person and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that recovery of stolen articles have been made from co-accused Golu Kumar. The petitioner is in custody since 30.06.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chowk P.S. Case No. 258 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T