Ratnesh Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53198 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -400 Year- 2016 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ratnesh Yadav Son of Ashok Yadav Resident of Village - Musepur, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Shobha Devi W/o Ratnesh Yadav, D/o Lal Babu Yadav resident of village - Musepur, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna, at present residing at Village - Pali, P.O. Pareo, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anant Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bihta P.S.Case no.400 of 2016 registered for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323,341, 354, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of assault by fists and slaps and the informant happens to be his wife and also he poured k-oil on her.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is in custody since 10.7.2018 and the charge-sheet has been submitted.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53198 of 2018 (3) dt.09-10-2018 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of SDJM, Danapur, District Patna in connection with Bihta P.S.Case No.400 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T