← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68420/2025bail rejected

Vikash Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-12Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68420 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2025 Thana- SRIPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vikash Pandey S/o- Shambhu Pandey Resident of Village- Lohati PS- Kateya, Dist- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Adesh Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner transpired during course of investigation on the basis of his confessional statement. Save and except confessional statement, there is no material against this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2025.

4. Learned APP however, vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the Gadasi which was used in the commission of offence was recovered by the police and the same was identified by the petitioner and co-accused.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68420 of 2025(3) dt.12-11-2025 2/2

5. Considering the facts aforesaid and nature of accusation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner abovenamed on bail in connection with Sripur PS Case No. 74 of 2025 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 348 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge III, Gopalganj. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

6. However, as the petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2025, the trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial preferably within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U