Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49358/2018dismissed

Sushan Manji @ Dinesh Manjhi @ Sushan Manjhi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49358 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -26 Year- 2018 Thana -MEERGANJ District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Sushan Manji @ Dinesh Manjhi @ Sushan Manjhi, Son of Rajendra Manjhi, Resident of Village- Bahora Tola, P.S.- Manjhagarh, DistrictGopalganj.

2. Manish Kumar, Son of Late Nagina Mahato, Resident of Village At Sadhu Chowk, Sareya Ward No. 4, P.S. Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Javed Aslam, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshnand Pandit, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Mirganj P.S.Case No. 26 of 2018, registered for the office under Sections 25 (1-b) and 26/35 of Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioners as per F.I.R. is of recovery of one loaded country made pistol having one live cartridge from the possession of petitioner No.1 and one country made loaded pistol with one live cartridge and one mobile from the possession of petitioner No. 2. Both persons are also accused in 4-5 criminal cases.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49358 of 2018 (3) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 is that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners and the petitioners is in custody since 07.02.2018. Heard learned A.P.P. also who opposed the prayed for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. However, they may renew prayer for bail after framing of charge.

With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition is accordingly dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T