Ranvir Singh Rajpur @ Ranbeer Singh @ Ranvir Singh Rajput v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76476 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11960 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.
Ranvir Singh Rajpur @ Ranbeer Singh @ Ranvir Singh Rajput S/o Late Parbhat Singh Resident Of Mohalla - Flat No 302, Khajpura Garden City, Lohiya Path, Jagdeo Path, P.S.- Hawai Adda, Distt. - Patna, Presently Curator-cum-Additional Director (Admin), Bihar Museum Patna, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna 2.
Yogendra Prasad Pal S/o Shambhu Prasad Pal R/o Mohalla - Gopal Nagar, Khagaul Road, Phulwari Sharif, P.S. - Phulwari Sharif, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Dr. Ankanksha D/o Rama Shanker Roy R/o D3 / 259, Near Nazir Building Gali, P.S. - Brahmpura, Distt. - Muzaffarpur at present R/o - Dixita Girls Hostel, Nageshwar Colony, P.S. - Budha Colony, Distt. - Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Sr. Adv Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2025 1.
Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2.
The learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners had moved this Court seeking quashing of the order of cognizance by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 70875 of 2024. It is next submitted that a learned Co-ordinate Bench by an order dated 30.09.2024 has been pleased to stay the further proceedings in the case before the learned Trial Court, as such, the petitioners do not have any apprehension of arrest in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76476 of 2024(3) dt.14-02-2025 2/2 the present case, hence seeks permission to withdraw the instant anticipatory bail application with liberty to file afresh, if need arises.
3.
Permission is accorded.
4.
Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. 5.
The learned senior counsel for the petitioners, at this stage, submits that the deficit court fee would be deposited. 6.
It is made clear that if the deficit court fee is not deposited, as pointed out by the office, in that event the liberty granted to the petitioners shall automatically become void. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T