Sunil Pandit v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64227 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2025 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sunil Pandit Son of Ramdev Pandit R/o Village -Gohi PS- Waris Nagar District -Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 127(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on hearing the cry of his cousin Rajesh, he reached the place of occurrence and saw the accused persons including the petitioner assaulting him, accordingly, intervened to save him, when accused Baleshwar gave orders to kill on which Raushan assaulted him by farsa causing injury on head and when his uncle came to save him, the accused persons dashed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64227 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 him on the ground and Satish snatched gold locket, further about three years ago, his uncle was killed for which Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 50 of 2022 was instituted against the accused persons and they had threatened to kill the entire family.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner. It is also submitted that informant alleges that Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 50 of 2022 was instituted against the accused persons for killing his uncle, but then petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64227 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 is pending/successor court in connection with Waris Nagar P.S. Case No. 70 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.
7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T