Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.61085 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -594 Year- 2018 Thana -KANKARBAG District- PATNA ====================================================== Sunny Kumar, Son of Shri Mithilesh Prasad, Resident of Mohalla/VillageAungari, P.S.- Aungaridham, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 594/2018, registered for the offence punishable under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is committing theft of mobile, cash and jewellery made of gold from the house of informant. It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He is a student and residing in rented room. His name has surfaced in this case on his confession before the police. No incriminating material has been found against him. Petitioner has clean antecedent. He is in custody since 13.07.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.61085 of 2018 (3) dt.30-10-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Patna in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 594/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T