Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67159/2023bail rejected

Md. Anjar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-17Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67159 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-316 Year-2023 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Anjar Son of Late Md. Ali Hasan Resident Of Village- Pupri Rajbag, PsPupri, Distt- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pupri P.S. Case No. 316 of 2023, lodged on 27.07.2023, under Sections 413/414/34 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, FIR has been lodged against four named accused persons, who were arrested from the place of occurrence where they were trying to fled away by motorcycle. Upon query, they have disclosed that the said motorcycle is subject to theft.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that case has been planted due to the reason that he is accused in series of cases and only due to this reason the police

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67159 of 2023(2) dt.17-10-2023 2/2 has filed further case against him. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 28.07.2023. He submits that there are ten criminal cases are pending against him and he is on bail in all cases.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that at the time of considering the bail application of the petitioner his criminal antecedents may be taken into consideration.

6. It transpires to this Court that there are in total ten criminal cases pending against the petitioner and he has been apprehended from the spot.

7. In this view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is rejected but liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he shall prefer his bail application three months after framing of the charge.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T