Patna High CourtCR. MISC./60427/2019bail granted

Chhotu Sonkar @ Chowkidar Akshay Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2019-10-24Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60427 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2019 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Chhotu Sonkar @ Chowkidar Akshay Raj, Son of Baban Sonkar, Resident of Mohalla- Usuf Chak, Takiya Ward No. 1, P.S.- Sasaram (Town), DistrictRohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2019 in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No.154 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the fact that there was no recovery from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown persons and that the petitioner's name has surfaced in the confessional statement made by a coaccused, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60427 of 2019(2) dt.24-10-2019 2/2 learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sasaram, Rohtas, in connection with Sasaram (Town) P.S. Case No.154 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T