Rameshwar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Superintendent Of Police, Saran, District- Saran And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.357 of 2017 Arising Out of COMPLAINT CASE No.-3394 Year-2016 Thana- SARAN District- Saran ====================================================== Rameshwar Prasad Son of Late Ram Briksh Prasad, resident of VillageDahiyawan Tola Prabhunath Nagar, Police Station- Chapra Muffasil, DistrictSaran. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Superintendent of Police, Saran, DistrictSaran 2.
The Sub-divisional Officer, Chapra, District- Saran. 3.
The Commissioner, Chapra, District- Saran.
4.
The Officer-in-charge, Chapra Harijan Police Station, Bhagwan Bazar, Chapra, District- Saran.
5.
Kedar Singh, Son of Bhuneshwar Singh.
6.
Sambhu Singh, Son of Bhuneshwar Singh.
7.
Abinash Kumar Singh, Son of Kedar Singh.
8.
Prince Kumar Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh, Son of Kedar Singh. 9.
Kalicharan Singh, Son of Shambhu Singh, All are residents of VillageDahiyawan Tola- Tadi, Police Station- Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raj Nandan Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma Aag-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-07-2019 This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the ;petitioner for directing the respondents, especially the respondent no.4, the Officer-in-charge, Chapra Bhagwan Bazar Harijan Police Station to register the first information report on the basis of a complaint bearing Complaint Case No. C-3394 of 2016 filed against the respondent nos. 5 to 9.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.357 of 2017(2) dt.23-07-2019 2/2 A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the State in which it has been stated that on the basis of the Complaint Case No. C-3394 of 2016, SC & ST P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017 has been registered against the accused persons inter alia under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. Since the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, the application has become infructuous. It is disposed of, accordingly.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/- U T