← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42614/2012dismissed

Mukesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-04-16The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.42614 of 2012 ======================================================

1. Mukesh Kumar S/O Late Vijay Kumar Resident Of Mohalla- Malikana, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna, At Present Residing At MohallaMittanghat, Gurhatta, P.S.- Khajekalan, Dist.- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Shri Gopal Govind Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Shri Shyam Bihari Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 16-04-2015 The petitioner figured as accused in Pirbahore P.S. Case No.206/10, wherein offences punishable under Sections-18A, 18B, 18C, 27B(ii), 28 and 28A of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act were alleged. The court of 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Patna took cognizance of the same through order dated 5.7.2012. The petitioner challenges the said order in this petition filed under Section-482 of Cr.P.C.

Heard Shri Gopal Govind Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Shyam Bihari Singh, learned A.P.P. for the State.

The only basis for the petitioner to challenge the order taking cognizance of the offence is that the entire case rests upon the statement said to have been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42614 of 2012 (2) dt.16-04-2015 2/2 recorded from the driver of a tempo and that nothing was recovered from the petitioner.

This plea hardly constitutes any basis for quashing the proceedings. The question as to whether the petitioner is the owner of the goods that were seized needs to be considered in the trial. This is not the stage to pronounce upon the merits of the matter.

The petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) K.C.jha/- U T