Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68580/2023bail rejected

Harsh Raj @ Kumar Harsh Raj Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-19Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68580 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Harsh Raj @ Kumar Harsh Raj Singh S/O Sanjay Kumar Singh R/O VillageSipahi Tola, Baska Ghat Road, Near Nahar, P.S- Madhubani(T.O.P), Distt.- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with K. Hat Madhubani P.S. Case No. 377 of 2023 lodged under Section 392 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown accused persons against whom the allegation of robbery of car, mobile and cash, etc. is there in the F.I.R..

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. His name has figured in this case by virtue of confessional statement of the co-accused. He further submits that the alleged loot of silver

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68580 of 2023(2) dt.19-10-2023 2/2 colour car has been recovered and seized by the police for which different case has been filed.

5. Counsel further submits that petitioner has been caught red handed in the stolen car along with the other coaccused for which a criminal case has been filed.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the present case has been filed for theft of the alto car and the said car has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and for the same, another case has been filed.

7. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

8. However, liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T