← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69182/2024allowed

Pintu Singh @ Sandeep Suman v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69182 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2024 Thana- Kharagpur District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Pintu Singh @ Sandeep Suman Son of Mahendra Singh @ Arbind Singh Village- Bari Mundheri Ps- H. Kharagpur Dist- Munger 2.

Mahendra Singh @ Arbind Singh Son of Late Chhedi Singh Village- Bari Mundheri Ps- H. Kharagpur Dist- Munger 3.

Gautam Singh son of Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Jhappu Singh Village- Bari Mundheri Ps- H. Kharagpur Dist- Munger ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mrs. Shashi Priya Pathak, Advocate Mr. Ambrish Kr. Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 504, 427, 506 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. All the accused persons including these petitioners armed with deadly weapons in furtherance of a common intention are said to have come to the house of the informant and started resorting firing. They also pelted stones at the house of the petitioner and forced the informant to put his signature on a form and thereafter threatened him of dire consequences.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69182 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to political rivalry. It is further submitted that petitioner no.1 is desirous to contest the PACS election hence to ruin his future prospect this false and frivolous case has been lodged against the petitioner no.1 and others. It is further submitted that nobody has suffered any injury in the alleged occurrence. Petitioners have criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with H. Kharagpur P.S. Case No.183 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T