← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70049/2024bail granted

Indal Yadav @ Indal Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-27Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70049 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2024 Thana- HUSSAINGANJ District- Siwan ====================================================== 1.

Indal Yadav @ Indal Kumar Yadav S/o Lal Bahadur Yadav Resident of Village- Jurkan, PS- Husainganj, Distt. - Siwan 2.

Lal Bahadur Yadav s/o Shivlochan Yadav Resident of Village- Jurkan, PSHusainganj, Distt. - Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajiv Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Shaheen Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 11 litres of liquor from land of Madan Singh. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioners and they came to be implicated at the instance of local people but then it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70049 of 2024(2) dt.27-09-2024 2/2 submitted that in majority of the cases, the police, in a mechanical manner, implicates either at the instance of Chowkidar, local person, secret information or confessional statement without holding a proper investigation.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 266 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 7.

It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioners shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioners and in the event if it is found that the petitioners have antecedent of more than one case, in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T