Mahant Vishnu Kant Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.807 of 2017 In CIVIL REVIEW No.498 of 2013 ====================================================== Mahant Vishnu Kant Das, chela of Late Sri Mahant Kishore Das, resident of Mohalla - Bhauara Tiwary Pokhar, P.S. - Madhubani, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Bihar State Hindu Religious Trust Board through the Chairman Vidyapati Marg, Patna.
3.
The District Registrar, District Registry Office, Madhubani. 4.
The Sub-Registrar District Registry Office, Madhubani. 5.
The Land Settlement Officer, Darbhanga.
6.
The Land Settlement Officer, Madhubani.
7.
The Land Settlement Officer, Samastipur.
8.
The Circle Officer, Madhubani, Rahika.
9.
Mohammad Mokhtar Alam son of Late Md. Azaz 10.
Md. Sahib son of Late Md. Aizaz 11.
Bibi Nehayat Khatoon wife of Md. Motiur Rehman 12.
Md. Imtiaz Ali son of Late Mumtaz 13.
Iftekhar Ahmad 14.
Md. Shamiullah 15.
Md. Baitullah son of Late Md. Ashini 16.
Md. Mosibullah, All 13 to 16 are sons of late Md. Ashinm 17.
Md. Nusrullah 18.
Md. Anarullah, Both 17 & 18 are sons of late Md. Sazik all residents of Mohalla - Manihar Tola, Ward No. 17, P.S. and District - Madhubani.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajeev Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 09-12-2021 The instant application stands filed for restoration of
Patna High Court MJC No.807 of 2017(4) dt.09-12-2021 2/2 Civil Review No. 498 of 2013, titled as Mahant Vishnu Kant Das Chela of Late Sri Mahanat Kishore Das Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors, which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 09.04.2014 passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court.
The review petition was rejected on 23.04.2014 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 09.04.2014. The instant application for restoration was filed only on 15.03.2017. No sufficient ground for delay or explanation for non-apperance is made out. In fact, the application which contains three paragraphs, does not explain any reason for delay or nonappearance of the petitioner. Litigation must come to an end at some stage. Litigant is not an illiterate/rustic person; not prevented from taking recourse to the remedies provided under law. He ought to have been vigilant in pursuing the matter.
As such, the instant application stands dismissed. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) Sujit/Ashwini U