Bittu Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66066 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2015 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria ====================================================== Bittu Tanti Son of Narayan Tanti Resident of Village- Gaddiya, P.S. Chautham, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 05-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Chautham P. S. Case No. 112/2015 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is alleged in the written report that this petitioner caused fire arm injury to the informant as well as to his brother-inlaw. The learned Sessions Judge, Khagaria, has mentioned in the impugned order that the informant and other injured have supported the case and have levelled specific allegation against this petitioner of causing fire arm injury to them. Case diary has been received.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66066 of 2018(4) dt.05-12-2018 2/2 Learned APP after looking into the case diary has submitted that doctor has found fire arm injury on the person of both the injured(s). The charge sheet has already been submitted against this petitioner under sections 341,307 and 504 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that some of the witnesses have stated that Dularchand Tanti has made firing. Learned APP has submitted that there is statement of witnesses in the case diary that this petitioner also made firing along with Dularchand Tanti. Both the injured(s) have levelled specific allegation against this petitioner of causing fire arm injury to them.

Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make efforts to conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of seven months from date of receipt of this order. (Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T