Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73656 of 2024 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36345 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2023 Thana- SAMASTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Paswan Son of Uday Paswan Resident of Village - Barapathar P.S. - Town, District - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rame Ranjan Raj Son of Late Ram Niwash Sharma Branch Head, Axis Bank Ltd., Samastipur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP For the Bank :
Mr. Dayanand Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-02-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and the learned counsel for the Axis Bank; Sri Dayanand Singh.
2. This is an application for modification of the order dated 21.06.2024 passed by this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 36345 of 2024.
3. It has been submitted by the parties that the petitioner has already paid Rs. 1,25,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Five Thousand) to the Bank and the remaining balance amount of Rs. 3,75,000/- (Three Lakh Seventy Five Thousand) shall be paid by the petitioner to the Bank within the next three
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73656 of 2024(3) dt.18-02-2025 2/2 months in the three equal installments.
4. The petitioner shall remain on provisional bail as directed earlier vide order dated 21.06.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 36345 of 2024 and the provisional bail shall be confirmed by the Court below only after the petitioner paid the remaining balance amount of Rs. 3,75,000/- (Three Lakh Seventy Five Thousand) to the bank within the next three months.
5. It is made clear that no further extension of time shall be granted to the petitioner. The amount deposited by the petitioner shall be released in favour of the concerned bank by the Court below.
6. In view of the above discussions, this modification application is allowed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U