Jharkhand Kumar @ Jharkhand v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60182 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2019 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== JHARKHAND KUMAR @ JHARKHAND, aged about 25 years (M), Son of Birendra Kharwar, Resident of Village- Chilbili Kudra, P.S.- Kudra, DistrictKaimur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjay Kumar Patel For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 401/ 411/ 413/ 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of gold and silver jewelries from his house.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Similarly, situated co-accused person has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 30.09.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No.60155 of 2019. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 21.07.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60182 of 2019(3) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 172 / 2019 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T