← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14618/2023dismissed

Khursida Bano v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-26Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14618 of 2023 ====================================================== Khursida Bano W/o- Late Erasad Ahmad, Resident of Village - Islampur, P.O.- Madanpur, District- Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Service, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Secretary-Cum- Executive Director, State Health Society, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate-Cum- Chairman, District Health Society, District -Aurangabad.

4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Aurangabad. 5.

The Civil Surgeon-Cum- Member Secretary, District Health Society, District- Aurangabad.

6.

The Health Manager -Cum- Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Center, Madanpur, District-Aurangabad.

7.

The District Programme Manager -Cum- District Health Society, DistrictAurangabad. 8.

The District Community Catalast District Health Society, District Aurangabad (Bihar).

9.

The District Immunization Officer, Aurangabad. 10.

The Additional Chief Medical Officer, Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binod Kr. Yadav (Sc18) For the SHS :

Mr. K.K.Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Shashi Shekhar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of appropriate writ(s), direction(s) to the respondents to fix and announce the date of appointment for the post of Asha Worker in Ward

Patna High Court CWJC No.14618 of 2023(2) dt.26-02-2024 2/2 no. 9 of Ishlampur Panchayat in Madanpur Block in the district of Aurangabad and appoint the petitioner as such on said post because she is quite eligible for the said post."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the Respondents authorities for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U