Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70550/2024dismissed

Md. Tabrej @ Tabrej v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70550 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-402 Year-2023 Thana- AMAUR District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Tabrej @ Tabrej S/O Md. Jabul Resident of Village- Simalbari, Dhanuram, P.S- Amour, Distt.- Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Amour P.S. Case No. 402 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(B), 379, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70550 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent, except one Complaint Case No. 2458 of 2023, filed against the petitioner and others but cognizance has not been taken yet.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is said to have assaulted on the head of the informant by means of katta and injury was found grievous in nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T