← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/4192/2018allowed

Rajeev Kumar @ Budul v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-10Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4192 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-504 Year-2018 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Rajeev Kumar @ Budul, S/o Late Wakil Singh, resident of Village Iniyar, P.S.- Muffasil Begusarai, Distict- Begusarai. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sri Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 10-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for regular bail vide order dated 05.10.2018 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Begusarai in Muffasil (Lakho O.P.) Police Station Case No.504 of 2018, corresponding to G.R. No.3802 of 2018 registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 323, 307, 427, 353, 337, 153(A), 356 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Sections 3(i)(r)(s), 3(2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.4192 of 2018 dt.10-12-2018 2/2 The F.I.R. is against 30-35 unknown miscreants, who allegedly abused the informant by taking caste name and committed brick bat, causing injury and damage to the vehicle. Appellant has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent. Appellant is in custody since 09.09.2018. Investigation of the case is already complete. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the condition that the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) abhishek/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 11.12.2018 Transmission Date 11.12.2018