Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav @ Mritunjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65863 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2017 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Pappu Kumar @ Pappu Yadav @ Mritunjay Kumar S/o Sitaram Prasad @ Sitaram Prasad Yadav R/o Village- Sheotar,Tola Dhaukal Bigha, P.S.- Atri, Distt- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 30(a) and (d) of the Bihar Excise Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 200 litres liquor from a place near graveyard at village Bhatbigha.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65863 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 implicated at the instance of local chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term, further the alleged recovery is from a place which is accessible to public at large.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 201 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T