Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66258 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2022 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/O Anik Yadav R/O Village- Nawadih, P.S-Lachhuar, District-Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-03-2023 Let the defects, if any, pointed out by the office be removed within three weeks from the date of this order, failing which the matter be listed again under the appropriate heading for necessary action.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Lachhuar P.S. Case No. 91 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution, the police personnel on secret information apprehended this petitioner and recovered a stolen motorcycle from his possession with forged number plate. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that during vehicle checking the petitioner was found riding a motorcycle using another motorcycle's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66258 of 2022(2) dt.14-03-2023 2/2 registration number upon the motorcycle which was seized from his possession and merely on that basis as well as nonproduction of relevant documents of the alleged motorcycle he was presumed to have been keeping a stolen motorcycle in his possession and he has been languishing in jail since 30.08.2022 and against him the investigation has been completed and the alleged offence is triable by First Class Magistrate. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the above submissions and mainly the young age of the petitioner mentioned in the petition and his custody period and also the fact that the alleged offence of FIR is triable by First Class Magistrate and against the petitioner investigation has been completed, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner namedabove be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Lachhuar P.S. Case No. 91 of 2022.

(Shailendra Singh, J.) maynaz/- U T