Rahul @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14498 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2017 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Rahul @ Ranjan Kumar sonof Shankar Saw, resident of village- Reetudih, P.S. Manabari, District Bokaro (Jharkhand).

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Jamui P.S.Case No.34 of 2017 for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, 2016.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the recovery is from Shanti Hotel but there is nothing available on record to show that he is related with the said Hotel as well as there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and he is in custody for about one month. He has no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14498 of 2017 (2) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 satisfaction of C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S.Case No.34 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U