Priyanka Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14359 of 2023 ====================================================== Priyanka Kumari Wife of Sumant Kumar, Resident of Village-Bariyarpur West, P.O. Tara Bariyarpur, P.S. Khodawandpur, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Directorate of I.C.D.S. Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Divisional Commissioner Munger Division, Munger. 5.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

6.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Majhaul, Begusarai. 7.

The Child Development Planning Officer (C.D.P.O.) Khodawandpur, Begusarai.

8.

The Lady Supervisor, The Child Development Planning Department, Khodawandpur, Begusarai.

9.

Smt. Manju Lata Rai, wife of Harimohan Kumar, Resident of VillageLagma, P.O. S. Lagma, P.S. Sakatpur, Prakhand Tardih, District-Darbhanga, at present residing at Village-Bariyarpur West, Ward No. 6, Khodawandpur, District-Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajnish Kumar Choubey, Advocate Mr. Rajnish Kumar, Choubey, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Mandal ( Sc 3 ) Mr. Bipin Kumar, AC to SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 19-03-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "That this application is being filed with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs for quashing the order dated 21.06.2023 passed by the respondent no.4 namely the Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division,

Patna High Court CWJC No.14359 of 2023(2) dt.19-03-2024 2/2 Munger by which he has dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner affirming the order dated 01.12.2022 contained in Memo No.

1577 passed by District Programme Officer, Begusarai by which the appeal preferred by the petitioner was rejected."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U