Gunjan Sadai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63452 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2014 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
GUNJAN SADAI Son of Late Shital Sadai Resident of Village / Muhalla - Inarwa, P.S.- Deodha, District- Madhubani 2.
Gulab Devi Wife of Late Shital Sadai Resident of Village / Muhalla - Inarwa, P.S.- Deodha, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.
Ram Kumari Devi Wife of Gunjan Sadai Resident of Village / Muhalla - Inarwa, P.S.- Deodha, District- Madhubani and At present - D/O - Kari Sadai, Resident of Village - Narra, P.S.- Kaluahi, District- Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
None For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 25-10-2021 None appears for the petitioner. Learned APP for the State is present.
In the instant petition, petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 25 of 2014, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 498(A), 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act, pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Madhubani. The prosecution case as per written report is that informant was married with petitioner no. 1 in the year 2012. After one year of marriage, petitioners started demanding a cow and Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63452 of 2019(10) dt.25-10-2021 2/2 20,000/- from the informant. On protest, accused persons subjected her to cruelty in different ways. Thereafter, informant informed her father. On getting information, father of the informant along with his co-villager came to her matrimonial house to pacify the matter but they were adamant on their demand. It is alleged that accused persons snatched her belongings and ousted her from her matrimonial house.
In the instant case, petitioner has benefit of interim protection for the last two years, therefore, the petition stands disposed off reserving liberty to the petitioner to move for regular bail before the jurisdiction court within a period of four weeks from the date of this order. Till then no precipitative action shall be taken against the petitioner in connection with Kaluahi P.S. Case No. 25 of 2014.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J) rakhi/- U T