Rupchand @ Mau Paswan @ Rup Chandra Paswan @ Maun Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67113 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2025 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rupchand @ Mau Paswan @ Rup Chandra Paswan @ Maun Paswan S/o Shiv Kumar Paswan Resident Of Village- Tetrawa, Ps- Manpur, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nagendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-10-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to passage, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67113 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 2/3 accused persons came and Sachchidanand, Ghanshyam and Ram Sowarat assaulted him by sword, brick and Kunta while petitioner fired to disperse the crowd.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to passage, an altercation had taken place in both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that in order to give seriousness to the case, it is alleged that petitioner fired for dispersing the crowd, but then no one was injured. It is next submitted that only one injury on head caused by hard and blunt substance was opined to be grievous as recorded in the order impugned, but then petitioner is not alleged to have assaulted.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67113 of 2025(2) dt.09-10-2025 3/3 released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T