← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20001/2013disposed

Smt. Urmila Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-07Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20001 of 2013 ====================================================== Smt. Urmila Devi, Smt. Urmila Devi, wife of Shri Karu Singh, resident of village Punaul, P.O. Chowar, P.S. Wazirganj, O.P.Tankuppa, District Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj, Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Gaya

3. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Gaya

4. The Sub Divisional Officer, District Gaya

5. The Executive Officer-cum-Block Development Officer, Block Tankuppa, District Gaya

6. Shri Indradeo Manjhi, Up-Pramukh, son of not known to the petitioner

7. Smt. Manju Devi wife of not known to the petitioner

8. Smt.Savitri Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner

9. Smt.Gayatri Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner

10. Smt.Shakuntala Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner

11. Smt.Muniya Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner

12. Smt.Lalmuni Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner

13. Smt. Kiran Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner

14. Smt. Usha Devi, wife of not known to the petitioner

15. Shri Rajesh Prasad, son of not known to the petitioner

16. Shri Jitendra Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner

17. Shri Shrikant Choudhary, son of not known to the petitioner

18. Shri Rajdeo Yadav, son of not known to the petitioner Respondent Nos. 6 to 8 are members of Panchayat Samiti-Tankuppa, District Gaya, represented through its Executive Officer-cum-Block Development Officer, Tankuppa, District Gaya .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harendra Pd. Singh, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 07-09-2015 Learned counsel for the parties are present and have been heard. Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by passage of time the matter has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

The interim order passed on 4.10.2013 stands vacated. Interlocutory application is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Bibhash/- U