Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65022/2022rejected

Vinod Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-22Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65022 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-475 Year-2022 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== VINOD SINGH S/O Sangam Singh R/O Village- Karisath, P.S-Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kalyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 21(c) and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. It is case of recovery of 440 Gm of Heroine/smack like substance and a mobile phone from the possession of the petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. He submitted that as alleged Heroine/smack was recovered from the possession of the petitioner but from the seizure list, it has not mention that alleged narcotics substance was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65022 of 2022(6) dt.22-08-2023 2/2 31.05.2022.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR and he has been made accused in two more cases. He further submitted that the seized Heroine/smack like substance from the possession of the petitioner comes within the purview of commercial quantity as per N.D.P.S. Act. During investigation several witnesses have also supported the prosecution case.

6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

7. The trial Court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U T