Sunita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5207 of 2013 ====================================================== Sunita Kumari W/O Purushottam Kumar Resident Of Village- Gosai Pesra, Police Station- Barachatti, Dist- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Bala D. Muragun, The District Magistrate, Gaya.
3. Kanthaiya Singh, The District Programme Officer, Gaya.
4. Smt. Sita Kutur, Child Development Project Officer, Barachatti , DisttGaya.
5. Mamta Kumari W/O Late R.G. Dipkant, Resident Of Village- Gosai Pesra Post Office- Diwania, Police Station- Barachatti, Distt- Gaya. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D. Sanjay, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Having regard to the fact that the direction given by this Court has been complied as would be apparent from perusal of the order of the Collector of Gaya district dated 14.12.2013 as communicated vide memo no. 3508 dated 19.12.2013 (AnnexureA to the show-cause reply), this Court would not find any reason to initiate a proceeding of contempt only on the ground that such order of the Collector has not been correctly implemented by the subordinate authorities. If the petitioner, therefore, has any grievance with regard to non-implementation of the order of the Collector, she may approach the Collector for redressal of her
Patna High Court MJC No.5207 of 2013 (2) dt.22-01-2015 grievance.
The submission that such an application has already been filed before the Collector of Gaya district by the petitioner has to be only noted for the purpose of observation that if the Collector of the district had passed the order, it is for him to ensure that the same is correctly complied in letter and spirit by the subordinate authorities.
With the aforementioned observation, this application is disposed of.
(Mihir Kumar Jha, J) Rishi/- U