Lal Khatbey @ Lal Khatbe @ Lal Babu Sah @ Lal Chaupal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60413 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2017 Thana- JALE District- Darbhanga ====================================================== LAL KHATBEY @ LAL KHATBE @ LAL BABU SAH @ LAL CHAUPAL Son of Laxmi Khatbey @ Laxmi Khtbe @ Laxmi Sah Resident of Village/Mohalla - Deora, P.S.- Jalley, Distt - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kedar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 26-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 332, 336, 353 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered in connection with Jalley P.S. Case No.147 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and the F.I.R. is against five known and 10-15 unknown accused persons. There is no specific over act against the petitioner. No injury has been caused to anyone. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of petitioner's arrest or surrender before court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60413 of 2019(2) dt.26-09-2019 2/2 connection with Jalley P.S.Case No. 147 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T