Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70054/2024dismissed

Bubun Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-21Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70054 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-537 Year-2024 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas ====================================================== Bubun Ram Son Of Late Laxman Ram @ Lakshman Ram R/O Vill.- Manikpur, P.S.- Indrapuri, Dist.- Rohtas At Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dehri (Town) P.S. Case No. 537 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2018.

3. As per the prosecution case, 7.1 litres of country made liquor is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that the petitioner was neither apprehended from the place of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70054 of 2024(2) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 occurrence nor anything has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent of similar nature as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the said illicit liquor is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the fact that the illicit liquor is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T