Jairam Ram @ Jairam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68031 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Jairam Ram @ Jairam S/o Late Bachauri Ram Resident of village - Bahuri, Post - Oran, P.S - Bhagwanpur, District - Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey, Advocate For the State :
Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, marriage of daughter of informant was solemnized with this petitioner on 12.05.2024 as per Hindu rites and rituals. It is alleged that thereafter, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, harassed and tortured the victim due to non-fulfillment of additional demand of dowry and subsequently committed her murder.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68031 of 2025(3) dt.27-11-2025 2/3
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be husband of the deceased. Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. As a matter of fact, the deceased died during course of treatment and only on suspicion, this petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with his family members, committed murder of daughter of informant due to nonfulfillment of additional demand of dowry. Petitioner is husband of the deceased who died unnatural death at her matrimonial house within seven years of marriage.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, gravity of offence and the fact that petitioner is husband of deceased, who died unnatural death at her matrimonial house within seven years of marriage, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68031 of 2025(3) dt.27-11-2025 3/3 petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T