Vinod Kumar And ORS v. The Bihar State Food And Civil Supplies Corporation And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5451 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.
Vinod Kumar son of Late Mahadeo Prasad, resident of D M Kothi, Club Road, Ara, P.S.- Nawada, District- Bhojpur.
2.
Manoj Kumar, 3.
Anil Kumar, Both both sons of Sri Laldhari Singh, resident of Village and P.O.- Niranjanpur, P.S.- Mahendia, District- Arwal. 4.
Brij Bhushan Tiwari, son of Sri Shashi Bhushan Tiwari, resident of Koai, P.S.- Dawath, District- Rohtas.
5.
Niraj Kumar Singh, son of Shamser Singh, resident of Village and P.O.- Danwar, P.S.- Kachwa, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation 2.
The Chief (Administration), Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar 3.
The Chief (Finance), Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar 4.
The Chief (Procurement), Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar 5.
The District Manager, State Food Corporation, District- Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mukesh Kumar no. 1 Mr. Prabhat Ranjan For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 22-05-2019 Matter has been listed today in the summer vacations as learned counsel for the petitioners was desirous for consideration of his case during vacation.
The slip for listing was filed pursuant to notice dated 08th May, 2019, published prior to the vacation.
The matter is, accordingly, taken up for consideration as both parties are present and willing to assist the court for disposal of the matter.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5451 of 2017(3) dt.22-05-2019 2/2 Heard counsel for the petitioners and counsel for the respondents-State.
It is prayed by counsel for the petitioners that he may be allowed liberty to approach respondent no.2 against the order dated 25.03.2017 whereby respondents- authorities have stopped taking work from petitioners on daily wages alleging their engagement is in violation of order dated 07.12.2016 issued by respondent no.2. Petitioners' counsel submits that he would approach respondent no.2 by making a representation as it is submitted that the case of petitioners is not covered by communication dated 07.12.2016 which has been made basis for their removal. Since issue has to be considered by respondent no.2 (The Chief {Administration}, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar) this court does not think it appropriate to keep writ petition pending. This writ petition is disposed off with liberty to the petitioners to pursue before respondent no.2.
This order may not be taken to be an expression on the merit of the claim of the petitioners.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) s.hassan/- U