Rakesh Kumar Bind @ Rakesh Beldar @ Rakesh Bind v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76867 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2018 Thana- KOTWALI District- Munger ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Bind @ Rakesh Beldar @ Rakesh Bind Son of Raju Bind Resident of Gumti No-2 P.S. Kotwali District Munger. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.J.K. Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act registered in connection with Kotwali (Basudeopur) P.S. Case No. 314 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of a petty dispute as the parties are neighbours. There is no injury caused to anyone. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kotwali (Basudeopur) P.S. Case No. 314 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. and with further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76867 of 2018(5) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 conditions -- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (iv) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

BT/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T