Sunil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68299 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3011 Year-2014 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Singh S/O Chandrarot @ Chandar Singh Resident Of VillageNaini, P.S.-Chapra Muffasil, District-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 3011 of 2014, Tr. No. 545 of 2023, registered for the alleged offence under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

03. As per prosecution case, co-accused Jitendra Kumar Singh executed 6-7 sale-deeds in favour of the wife of the complainant and later on, the complainant came to know that in one of the sale-deeds, description of the property was in the name of some other person. Even the sale-deed executed by the co-accused, Jitendra Kumar Singh, was on the basis of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68299 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 2/3 bogus power of attorney.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been made accused in this case only with a view to harass him. The petitioner acted as identifier on the sale-deed, otherwise the petitioner has no role in the occurrence and in the whole complaint case, nothing specific has been alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has got no criminal history.

05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner is stated to be an identifier on the sale deed and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner for any wrong doing and also considering the possibility of false implication, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68299 of 2023(3) dt.29-02-2024 3/3 Chapra / concerned court in connection with Complaint Case No. 3011 of 2014, Tr. N. 545 of 2023, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ashish/- U T