Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66124 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Prasad S/o Suresh Yadav R/o VillageMalathi, P.S.- Makhdumpur (Tehta O.P.), Dist.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Neeraj, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Makhdumpur (O.P. Tehta) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 303(2) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the accused persons assaulted the informant and his son by means of rod and butt causing injury on their head and also snatched a golden chain worth Rs. 40,000/- and cash of Rs.20,000/-.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus. The parties are own gotiya and there is enmity between them due to land dispute. There is case and counter case between the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66124 of 2025(4) dt.21-01-2026 2/2 parties. The petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioner to be general and omnibus and there is case and counter case between the parties, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Jehanabad in connection with Makhdumpur (Tehta O.P.) P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS.

7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

8. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T