Munder Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1202 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -226 Year- 2015 Thana -ATRI District- GAYA ====================================================== Munder Yadav Son of Karu Yadav Resident of Village- Kajur tola Fulbigha, P.S. - Atri, District- Gaya.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant.

The appellant seeks regular bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 226 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015.

There is allegation of assault to the informant by Khanti.

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that there is no any specific allegation of assault against the appellant rather the same is against other co-accused person and the allegation of abusing the informant by taking cast name is not on public place or public view.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the fact

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1202 of 2017 (2) dt.17-05-2017 2/2 that there is no specific allegation against the appellant and he has remained in custody for about three months, let the appellant, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the the Special Judge, SC/ST, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 226 of 2015. . With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the appellant shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The appellant will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The appellant shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

The appeal is, accordingly, allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) S.Pandey/- U T