Rajiv Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65196 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2022 Thana- SOHSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rajiv Raj S/O Viresh Sharma R/V- Rupaspur, P.S.- Harnaut, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Zainul Abedin, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, two country-made katta and six live cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on account of village politics. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65196 of 2022(2) dt.13-03-2023 2/2 has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nalanda Bihar Shariff in connection with Sohsarai P.S. Case No. 150 of 2022, with a condition:-
1. The court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and at any stage, if it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T