← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69193/2024allowed

Kumari Anita @ Anita Kumar @ Anita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-22Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69193 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2024 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Kumari Anita @ Anita Kumar @ Anita Kumari Daughter of Late Hari Prasad Mehta Resident Of Village -Paharpur Ps- Lakhisarai (Op Madani )DistrictLakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024 Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 354, 363, 365, 511, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is that she in association of other co-accused tried to caught the niece of the informant and pull into the car forcibly. The accused persons defame the informant. When the niece of the informant made alarm then the villagers rushed in her rescue, thereafter giving threatening all the persons fled away.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69193 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 2/3 that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. She has been falsely implicated in this case due to political rivalry. It is further submitted that she has recently contested the election from the Munger Lok Sabha Constituency and only to malign her character this false and frivolous case has been lodged against her. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Suryagraha P.S. Case No. 152 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69193 of 2024(2) dt.22-10-2024 3/3

7. The court below is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in paragraph no.3, this order will loose its force automatically.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T