Bimlesh Kumar Renu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64780 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-165 Year-2021 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Bimlesh Kumar Renu S/O Birendra Patel Resident of Village- Salsala, P.S.- Nawanagar (Sonbarsa), District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Patna 2.
Shweta Priya D/O Sri Shyam Nandan Singh R/O Vill.- Sonkukra, P.O. and P.S.- Masoudhi, Dist.- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Dr.Kamal Deo Sharma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. Despite service of notice upon the father of the informant, no one has appeared in this case.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nawanagar (Sonbarsa) P.S. Case No. 165 of 2021 dated 12.05.2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that she was married to the petitioner and thereafter, the
2/4 named accused persons started torturing her mentally and physically for dowry.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and no such demand of dowry has ever been made. It has further been submitted that the petitioner and the informant are living together and after the filing of the present case, two children were born out of the said wedlock and the informant is happily residing in the said house. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submitted that learned C.J.M., Baxar has taken cognizance for the offence under Section 498(A) of the I.P.C. against the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
3/4 the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nawanagar (Sonbarsa) P.S. Case No. 165 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with corresponding Section 482(2) of BNSS as well as subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present before the concerned Court on each and every date of the trial and shall cooperate in the investigation.
(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. (iv) The trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the trial court shall take necessary steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made
4/4 in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Sourendra Pandey, J) Gautam/- U T