Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18966/2017bail granted

Ravi Ranjan Dubey @ Ravi Ranjan @ Dablu Dubey v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18966 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2017 Thana -RAJPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================

1. RAVI RANJAN DUBEY @ RAVI RANJAN @ DABLU DUBEY Sono f Sri Sanjay Debey Resident of Village-Kochas, P.S.-Kochas, DistrictRohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajpur P.S.Case No.50 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 & 273 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 80 pouch of country-made liquor.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal antecedent and remained in custody for more than 1 1⁄2 months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of small quantity of liquor recovered from the possession of the petitioner and also considering the fact that he has no criminal antecedent, as such,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18966 of 2017 (2) dt.02-05-2017 2/2 let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J. 2ndcum-Spl. Excise Act, Buxar in connection with Rajpur P.S.Case No.50 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U