Md. Shahjjad @ Md. Sahjad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75941 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1238 Year-2017 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Md. Shahjjad @ Md. Sahjad S/o Late Abdul Hamid, a resident of Village/Mohalla D.B. Road Machhali Market, P.S. Sadar, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Umeshnand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Special Case No. 6/ 2017, arising out of Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 1238/2017, instituted for offence under Section(s) 120B of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 20 and 22 of the NDPS Act.

It is alleged in the written report that the informant/S.I., Sadar P.S., Saharsa on getting secret information from SDM and SDPO, Saharsa reached Fish Market, D.B. Road, Saharsa along with other officials and raided the house of Md. Samsad and Md. Sahjad. Seeing the police party two female and one male members managed to escape. On search of the house of Md. Samsad, police recovered huge quantity of Ganja kept in plastic packets as well as in cigarettes and also

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75941 of 2018(3) dt.21-01-2019 2/2 cash of Rs. 1,67,750/-.

On search of the house of this petitioner, police recovered several plastic packets of Ganja and several cigarette packets filled with Ganja as mentioned in written report along with amount of Rs. 84,436/- from the Gumati of petitioner. Accordingly seizure-list was prepared in presence of independent witnesses.

From the seizure-list it appears that from the house and Gumati of this petitioner Ganja kept in several plastic packets and in cigarettes have been recovered. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, prayer for bail of petitioner is rejected.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T