Gama Devi @ Rama Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68523 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- HATHUA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1 .

Gama Devi @ Rama Devi Wife of Ramjeet Chaudhari @ Ramjeet Yadav Resident of Village - Bari Ishar, Police Station - Hathua, District - Gopalganj 2.

Sarita Devi @ Sarita Kumari @ Reeta Devi Wife of Bitu Yadav @ Bittu Yadav Resident of Village - Bari Ishar, Police Station - Hathua, District - Gopalganj 3 .

Bitu Yadav @ Bittu Yadav Son of Ramjeet Chaudhari Resident of Village - Bari Ishar, Police Station - Hathua, District - Gopalganj. 4.

Ramjeet Chaudhari @ Ramjeet Yadav Son of Late Vishwanath Yadav Resident of Village - Bari Ishar, Police Station - Hathua, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yogendra Tiwari , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Sections 80, 103 (1) and 3(5) of BNS.

3 . As per prosecution case , daughter of informant was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68523 of 2025(3) dt.07-11-2025 2/3 married with with co-accused Manu Yadav about 4 years ago and after the marriage , she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by all the accused persons due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and ultimately the accused persons committed the murder of informant's daughter.

4. Petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 2 is sister-in -law , petitioner No. 3 is devar and petitioner No. 4 is father-in -law of the deceased. They are simple victim of over implications. Allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with deceased and her husband Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased who is already in custody since 03.05.2025 . Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts, clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances of the case , let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Gopalganj in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68523 of 2025(3) dt.07-11-2025 3/3 connection with Hathua P.S. Case No. 90 of 2025 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T