Punam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1852 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Punam Kumari Wife Of Dharmedra Singh Resident Of Village- Marachchi, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, Block- Lakari Naviganj, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Direcotr, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Siwan

5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Siwan

6. The District Education Officer, Siwan

7. The District Programme Officer, (Establishment) Siwan

8. The Prakhand Pramukh, Lakari Naviganj, District- Siwan

9. The Block Development Officer, Lakari Naviganj, District- Siwan

10. The Block Education Officer, Lakari Naviganj, District- Siwan

11. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Bhada Khurd, Block- Lakari Naviganj, District- Siwan

12. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhada Khurd, Block- Lakari Naviganj, District- Siwan

13. The Member District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority Siwan

14. Mamta Kumari D/O Upendra Singh Resident Of Village- Marachi, P.S.- Jamo Bazar, District- Siwan .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. UMESH KUMAR MISHRA For the Respondent/s : Mr. G.K. AGRWAL GA10 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-08-2015 *************** 28.08.2015 In view of the decision rendered in case of Kalpana Rani Vs. State of Bihar, reported in 2014 (2) P.L.J.R. 665 writ application stands dismissed. No interference is warranted, because the issue of legality or illegality at the level of engagement as a Panchayat Siksha Mitra is not required to be reopened.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U