Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14816 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2017 Thana- NAYAGAON District- Begusarai ====================================================== Sita Ram Singh, Son of Ram Pravesh Singh, Resident of VillageMahendrapur, P.S.- Nayagaon, Dist- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Nayagaon P.S. case no. 62 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 325, 307/34 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is specific allegation in the written report of assaulting the informant against co accused Ram Pravesh. The allegation against this petitioner is that he caught the waist of the informant. It is further submitted that there is land dispute between the parties and the altercation has taken place on account of such dispute. It is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition that petitioner has clean antecedents.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14816 of 2018(3) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Nayagaon P.S. case no. 62 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-IV, Begusarai, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.