Akhilesh Sharma @ Aklesh Sharma @ Akhilesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73158 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3640 Year-2009 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE District- Vaishali ====================================================== Akhilesh Sharma @ Aklesh Sharma @ Akhilesh Kumar Son of Ramnaumi Sharma Village- Naya Gaon, Ps- Desri, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Reena Devi Wife of Akhilesh Sharma Village- Naya Gaon, Ps- Desri, DistVaishali At Present Residing at D/o- Suresh Sharma, Village- Sabalpur Chaharan, Ps- Sonpur, Dist- Saran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mritunjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Despite issuance of notice to the opposite party no. 2, she has not appeared in the present proceeding.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 323, 498A, 406, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 & 4 of the D.P. Act.
3. The prosecution case is based upon a complaint filed by the opposite party no. 2 in which she has made an allegation of demand of dowry and torture. Petitioner is the husband of opposite party no.2.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations levelled in the complaint are not correct and as a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73158 of 2024(8) dt.16-06-2025 2/2 matter of fact, the petitioner has always been ready to keep the opposite party no.2 with full dignity and honour while the opposite party no. 2 herself is not ready to reside in the matrimonial house. A supplementary affidavit has also been filed bringing on record the fact that no coercive processes have been issued against the petitioner till date.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. In such view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 3640/09/Tr. No. 638, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S., and subject to the further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation/trial.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T