Most. Kalawati Kuar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19964 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2017 Thana- CHAKIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Most. Kalawati Kuar Wife of late Bihari Sah Resident of Village- Ahirwaliya, P.S. Chakia, District East Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Smt. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends her arrest in Chakia P.S. case no. 241 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is mother of co accused Shugan Sah. In the written report, it is alleged that father of the informant after withdrawing money went to the house of accused Shugan Sah and he did not return in the night. The informant got information on next morning that the dead body of his father was lying in front of the house of Shugan Sah. There is no allegation of specific overt act against this petitioner.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19964 of 2018(3) dt.08-05-2018 2/2 petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Chakia P.S. case no. 241 of 2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Motihari, East Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T