← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3151/2025disposed

Md. Aftab Khan v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar

2025-10-31Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3151 of 2025 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1423 of 2023 ====================================================== Md. Aftab Khan S/o Late Altaf Khan, Resident of village- Kakila, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur, Bihar- 802158. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna, Bihar. 5.

The Superintendent of Police (West), Patna, Bihar. 6.

The S.H.O., Bihta Police Station, Patna.

7.

The A.S.I., namely Chandra Shekhar Azad of Bihta Police Station, Patna. 8.

The District Magistrate, Patna Bihar.

9.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Additional Advocate General 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 31-10-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The defect no. 52 is ignored. The defect no. 3 shall be removed in the course of the day.

3. The ACJM-II, Danapur is directed to consider the release petition dated 09.11.2023 filed by the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and dispose of the same in accordance with law.

4. It is clarified that the stay of further proceedings granted by this Court vide order dated 02.05.2024 passed in Cr.

Patna High Court MJC No.3151 of 2025(2) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 WJC No. 1384 of 2023 titled as 'Shiv Mohan Singh Yadav @ Shiv Mohan Singh vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.' means that no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner and this Court has not stayed the release of the Arms etc. which were seized by the police.

5. In view of the above, this application stands disposed of.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T